Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-06 House Journal Page 1369 HB 280 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 280 "An Act relating to the regulation of commercial motor vehicles to avoid loss or withholding of federal highway money, and to out- of-service orders concerning commercial motor vehicles; amending Rule 43.1, Alaska Rules of Administration; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page TRA RPT 5DP 2NR 1199 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 1199 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 7DP 2NR 1312 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 1313 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 280(FIN) "An Act relating to the regulation of commercial motor vehicles to avoid loss or withholding of federal highway money, and to out- 2003-05-06 House Journal Page 1370 of-service orders concerning commercial motor vehicles; moving authority for commercial motor vehicle regulation from the Department of Public Safety to the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; amending Rule 43.1, Alaska Rules of Administration; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 280(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 280(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 280(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 280(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Gruenberg, Kapsner Absent: Croft, Guttenberg, Seaton And so, CSHB 280(FIN) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2003-05-06 House Journal Page 1371 CSHB 280(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.